The controversial Northern Pass project has re-mapped a portion of its proposed route.
The developer says the revised transmission route carrying hydroelectric power from Quebec into New England addresses environmental and economic concerns.
But opponents still call it a bad deal for the North Country.
To build the Northern Pass, Public Service of New Hampshire would use about 147 miles of its existing right-of-way, but needs access to about 32 more miles through New Hampshire.
Opponents say the overhead transmission lines would ruin the scenic character of the region. But Public Service of New Hampshire spokesman Martin Murray says the new, less populated eastern route will not need as much new land as originally proposed, and will include over seven miles of underground lines.
Murray says the new route will bring, “A much more significant infusion of tax revenue because the underground technology is quite expensive." He says that will mean more money for some towns along the route.
But for many opponents, the tax benefits are outweighed by environmental concerns.
Cristophe Courchesne is a staff attorney for the Conservation Law Foundation, a leading opponent of Northern Pass. He says the revised route, even with buried lines, is still unacceptable.
“It simply just re-drew a line north of Groveton and left most of the project exactly as it was before,” Courchesne said.
CLF rejects the company’s claim that the new transmission lines will lower electric bills, and blasts the utility for relying on what it calls “dirty and inefficient power plants.”
PSNH counters that the 1.4 billion dollar project will be financed by its developers, not by ratepayers, and will deliver cleaner, cheaper energy and create jobs. The federal and state permitting process could be lengthy, because the utility does not currently have rights to use state and local roads.
Meanwhile, opponents of the project are trying to block it with strategic land purchases.