Many Vermonters support a pending ban on food waste from landfills. But a new University of Vermont study found few people want to pay for curbside pick-up of their food scraps.
The landfill ban goes into effect this year. The UVM study found 55% of Vermonters support the ban, and 72% already compost food waste or feed it to livestock or pets.
“That was a really high number. I was pretty surprised by that actually,” said Meredith Niles, an assistant professor in nutrition and food sciences at UVM. “And we also found that about 75% of Vermonters are interested in composting in the future.”
But while people support the idea of keeping leftovers from landfills, and may be committed to home composting themselves, they don’t want to pay extra for food waste pick-up.
“We found that only about a third of Vermonters were interested in using one of those [curbside] programs in the future,” said Niles, who was the lead author of the study. “And most of them indicated they'd be unwilling to pay anything additional for the service.”
The study results were based on questions in the 2018 “Vermonter Poll” conducted annually by UVM’s Center for Rural Studies. The statewide telephone poll surveyed about 600 Vermont households.
Niles said the study showed that there’s no single solution to managing the state’s food waste. She noted people living in more urban counties or who are renters were more supportive of curbside pick-up programs.
“And so I do think that reflects this idea that people in more densely populated areas, apartment buildings or more densely populated regions, there might be greater interest in those types of programs,” she said. “But in more rural places of Vermont, it may not be the best strategy for all households.”
In general, just a third of those surveyed said they would pay up to $10 a month for curbside pickup. The support dropped precipitously as the cost of the service rose.
“Once it’s over $10 bucks a month about 90% were unwilling to pay anything more than that,” Niles said.
UVM said a research grant from Casella Waste Systems helped pay for the study, though a written statement released by the university said Casella was not involved in the data collection, analysis, or interpretation for the study results.