VPR Header
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
Available On Air Stations

Schubart: College Survival

A building on the Green Mountain College campus
Nina Keck
The recently announced closure of Green Mountain College is an 'indicator of the changes roiling the college marketplace.'

My private college tuition in 1968 was $2,800, 50 years later it’s $50,000. Meanwhile, state support for public colleges has diminished and educational value has changed both for better and for worse. Green Mountain College is an indicator of the changes roiling the college marketplace and in unfortunate cases like this, we most often see little more than hand-wringing, appeals for more money, and the reapplication of shop-worn tools to stave off the inevitable.

For those who must measure student debt against educational and future employment value, the value equation for college has diminished. Student debt now tops a trillion and a half dollars. There are fewer college-bound students and those remaining are either privileged and undeterred by high tuitions or reluctant to acquire crippling debt. Current White House xenophobic policies have reduced foreign applications. Statistics about college graduation rates and future income expectations are also skewed by luminary exceptions like Bezos, Gates, Zuckerberg, and Jobs.

For years, the U.S. News college ranking service has reflected distorted values and triggered competition among colleges that added little beyond expense to the core educational mission – student centers, elite apartments, pools, shops, and fitness centers. Competition, long the core belief system of capitalism, hasn’t worked in either health care or education, both traditionally mission-driven enterprises.

Colleges must rethink traditional college governance. Those that simply turn to philanthropy to offset operating losses will soon learn that charity can’t shore up an eroding value equation.

If every college were to establish a center of excellence in the humanities, science, business, or public policy, it could then focus limited resources on being the best.

This kind of preemptive change is disruptive, but the best teachers and institutions that understand changing economic and demographic patterns, are willing to reconfigure faculty, administrative, and governance relationships, and focus on their core excellence will weather the storm.

Related Content